A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children household at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, in which growth pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven inhabitants. Based on the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their potential neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that become emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water during intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the site turned One of the more placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children property in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Specific Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist information and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with planning permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.